(((•)))
tech.interfluidity.com
a notebook by steve randy waldman
→ See also top, archive, subscribe, drafts blog, interfluidity main
2026-06-11 ⇒

# Feedletter dockerified

TL; DR: You can try `feedletter` dockerified here.

One thing you can say about software or "tech" is it's always changing. A relatively small fraction of the change, in my view, counts as progress, but there is so much change that even a small percentage accumulates pretty fast.

One of many, many trends in software that I never much mastered or paid attention to is "containerization". I am very accustomed to setting up old-school UNIX services (or kind of new school, since I tend to manage them under `systemd`). I haven't worked in the kind of high volume, dynamically scaling settings under which gadgets like Kubernetes makes sense. So, I've mostly ignored Docker and related technologies.

But, in my long and lonesome life, one sorrow I have is that software I write, good software I think, often ends up with a single lonesome user, me, even though most of what I write I publish as free software.

One thing I wrote that I think is good is `feedletter`. If you are seeing this note, it could very well be because feedletter pushed it to you, by e-mail, on Mastodon, or on Bluesky. Plus, I have ideas for feedletter. I mean to extend it to do a few more things pretty soon.

When I first published `feedletter`, I wrote a long tutorial for it on this website. In fact, there are three instructional posts regarding `feedletter` here:

- Feedletter tutorial
- Style-by-mail in feedletter
- Syndicating RSS to Mastodon and BlueSky with feedletter

Nevertheless, I can't pretend `feedletter` isn't a bit intimidating to set up and use. A person accustomed to hosting UNIX services should find it easy work, but it is some hassle.

So, I thought, why not try to learn a bit about Docker by Docker-ifying `feedletter`. Maybe it'd be an easier, less intimidating way for people to give the service a chance.

I've been meaning to try this for a while, but the fixed cost of all I'd have to learn dissuaded me.

But, now in the age of mysterious coding creatures, I thought why not see if I can't collaborate with Claude code and get it done quickly?

So that's what I did. I don't think what I've done counts as "vibe coding". I inspected all the artifacts Claude generated, asked a lot of questions, learned some stuff about Linux namespaces. Where my actual application code was touched, I mostly touched it myself, although Claude has been a very helpful reviewer and bug spotter.

But Claude did generate almost all of what's in the `feedletter-docker` repository, including its README.md.

I've worked through Claude's instructions there, and at this point everything seems to work fine, though we did have a few bumps along the way.

("We." It's a fascinating question whether that's the right pronoun.)

This mini project was, nevertheless, more time consuming than I expected. The coding — both the minor modifications I made to `feedletter` itself, and the artifacts Claude produced and edited with remarkable speed and accuracy — was a very small part of the time spent.

Testing was the pain point. I don't know how to automate spinning up a server, installing Docker, editing environment and config files, running dockerified admin commands, etc. Most of the time I spent running and rerunning the service, hitting hiccups (more my errors than Claude's!), and restarting the cycle. (I didn't spin up new servers and reinstall Docker every time, but I did try to start with a fresh clone of my repository, imagining I was one of you folk out there giving it a try.)

Still, the set up is much quicker than the native UNIX server. But some of the functionality is quirkily arranged to manage frictions presented by the boundary between a container and outside file systems and networks.

The default setup circumvents the hassle of configuring a web front end like `nginx` and getting SSL certificates, but at cost of letting `caddy` take exclusive control over ports 80 and 443, which many users will not abide.

Claude generated an alternative path to run the Dockerized service behind a reverse-proxy front end, so that your feedletter installation can be one virtual host among many. (That's how I run my real feedletter service, though in un-Dockerized form.) I have not tested Claude's scheme for Dockerized feedletter with external TLS yet, though.

Anyway, if this appeals to you, plase give it a try! I hope to have more to say about extensions to `feedletter` pretty soon.

p.s. "Claude" here was Opus 4.8.

← Updated: Feedletter tutorial
↑↑↑
Teasing RSS feeds with LLMs →